Response to "Comment on Khanna (2023)"

Gaurav Khanna

No 71, I4R Discussion Paper Series from The Institute for Replication (I4R)

Abstract: Roodman (2023) (henceforth R23) re-evaluates Khanna (2023) (henceforth K23). R23 is able to replicate K23's results, highlighting no mistakes in K23's analysis. R23 argues that K23's results may be sensitive to recreating part of the underlying district-level sample, using a subset of K23's datasets. In this reply, I show that despite concerns with R23's sample construction, K23's results are robust to evaluating R23's sample as given. R23 raises other secondary questions, which this reply answers. I also address R23's misinterpretations of K23's general equilibrium model.

Date: 2023
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-inv
Note: This paper responds to: Roodman, David. 2023. Large-Scale Education Reform in General Equilibrium: Regression Discontinuity Evidence from India - Comment. I4R Discussion Paper Series No. 70. Institute for Replication. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/276969
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/276970/1/I4R-DP071.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:71

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in I4R Discussion Paper Series from The Institute for Replication (I4R)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().