A reply to Listo, Saberian and Thivierge (2023)

Ralph De Haas and Alexander Popov

No 96, I4R Discussion Paper Series from The Institute for Replication (I4R)

Abstract: Listo, Saberian and Thivierge (2023) conduct a careful replication of De Haas and Popov (2023) using the data, code, and instructions we made available at the time of publication. They highlight an inconsistency between the table notes and the main text in how the clustering of standard errors is described; uncover a coding mistake in the GMM regressions; and show that weak instruments are unlikely to bias our 2SLS coefficients. In this reply, we show that our results remain economically meaningful and statistically precise (though smaller in magnitude) when we (i) cluster standard errors by country in the country panel; (ii) correct the GMM code; and (iii) include or exclude China in the country and industry samples.

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/280693/1/I4R-DP096.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:96

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in I4R Discussion Paper Series from The Institute for Replication (I4R)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (econstor@zbw-workspace.eu).