Are linear models really unuseful to describe business cycle data?
Artur Silva Lopes and
Gabriel Florin Zsurkis
No 2017-5, Economics Discussion Papers from Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW)
The authors use first differenced logged quarterly series for the GDP of 29 countries and the euro area to assess the need to use nonlinear models to describe business cycle dynamic behaviour. Their approach is model (estimation)-free, based on testing only. The authors aim to maximize power to detect non-linearities and, simultaneously, they purport avoiding the pitfalls of data mining. The evidence the authors find does not support some descriptions because the presence of significant non-linearities is observed for 2/3 of the countries only. Linear models cannot be simply dismissed as they are frequently useful. Contrarily to common knowledge, nonlinear business cycle variation does not seem to be a universal, undisputable and clearly dominant stylized fact. This finding is particularly surprising for the U.S. case. Some support for nonlinear dynamics for some further countries is obtained indirectly, through unit root tests, but this can hardly be invoked to support nonlinearity in classical business cycles.
Keywords: business cycles; nonlinear time series models; testing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C22 C51 E32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:ifwedp:20175
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economics Discussion Papers from Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().