Which tests not witch hunts: a diagnostic approach for conducting replication research
Annette Brown () and
No 2017-77, Economics Discussion Papers from Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW)
This paper provides researchers with an objective list of checks to consider when planning a replication study with the objective of validating findings for informing policy. These replication studies should begin with a pure replication of the published results and then reanalyse the original data to address the original research question. The author presents tips for replication exercises in four categories: validity of assumptions, data transformations, estimation methods, and heterogeneous impacts. For each category he offers an introduction, a tips checklist, some examples of how these checks have been employed, and a set of resources that provide statistical and econometric details.
Keywords: Replication; diagnostic; validation; impact evaluation; reanalysis; risk of bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C10 B41 A20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:ifwedp:201777
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economics Discussion Papers from Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by ZBW - German National Library of Economics ().