Which tests not witch hunts: a diagnostic approach for conducting replication research
Annette Brown and
Benjamin Wood
No 2017-77, Economics Discussion Papers from Kiel Institute for the World Economy
Abstract:
This paper provides researchers with an objective list of checks to consider when planning a replication study with the objective of validating findings for informing policy. These replication studies should begin with a pure replication of the published results and then reanalyse the original data to address the original research question. The author presents tips for replication exercises in four categories: validity of assumptions, data transformations, estimation methods, and heterogeneous impacts. For each category he offers an introduction, a tips checklist, some examples of how these checks have been employed, and a set of resources that provide statistical and econometric details.
Keywords: Replication; diagnostic; validation; impact evaluation; reanalysis; risk of bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A20 B41 C10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2017-77
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/169136/1/898640105.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Which tests not witch hunts: A diagnostic approach for conducting replication research (2018) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:ifwedp:201777
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economics Discussion Papers from Kiel Institute for the World Economy Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().