More stringent BITs, less ambiguous effects on FDI? Not a Bit!

Axel Berger (axel.berger@die-gdi.de), Matthias Busse, Peter Nunnenkamp and Martin Roy

No 1621, Kiel Working Papers from Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel)

Abstract: We focus on investor-state dispute settlement provisions contained in various, though far from all, bilateral investment treaties as a possible determinant of BIT-related effects on bilateral FDI flows. Our estimation results prove to be sensitive to the specification of these provisions as well as the inclusion of transition countries in the sample. Stricter dispute settlement provisions do not necessarily result in higher FDI inflows so that the effectiveness of BITs as a credible commitment device remains elusive.

Keywords: Dispute Settlement; BITs; FDI flows (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F21 F23 K33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/30258/1/624784819.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: More stringent BITs, less ambiguous effects on FDI? Not a bit! (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:ifwkwp:1621

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Kiel Working Papers from Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (econstor@zbw-workspace.eu).