Whom to Send to Doha? The Shortsighted Ones!

Mario Larch and Wolfgang Lechthaler

No 1695, Kiel Working Papers from Kiel Institute for the World Economy

Abstract: Why are empirically observed tariffs so much lower than theoretically calculated Nash-equilibrium tariffs? We argue that this gap can be narrowed by using a dynamic model instead of a static model. This approach has two advantages. (i) It allows us to take account of the transitional process after a change in tariffs. (ii) It allows us to take account of the shortsightedness of policy makers. We show that Nash-equilibrium tariffs based on a dynamic trade model are lower than Nash-equilibrium tariffs based on a static model. We also show that shortsighted politicians tend to set lower tariffs than politicians with a long planning horizon.

Keywords: Bubbles; fiscal theory of the price level; collateral constraints; neutrality; transversality conditions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F11 F12 F13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/45888/1/656985291.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Whom to send to Doha? The Short-sighted Ones! (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:ifwkwp:1695

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Kiel Working Papers from Kiel Institute for the World Economy Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().