Staffing foreign subsidiaries with parent country nationals or host country nationals? Insights from European subsidiaries

Christoph Dörrenbächer, Jens Gammelgaard, Frank McDonald, Andreas Stephan and Heinz Tüselmann

No 74, Working Papers from Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute of Management Berlin (IMB)

Abstract: This paper investigates the relationship between the use of parent company nationals (PCN) and home country nationals (HCN) and various attributes in foreign owned subsidiaries in Denmark, Germany and the UK. The study explores whether the existing literature on international staffing adequately captures the effects of PCN verses HCN managers on key characteristics of subsidiaries. The results of the study indicate that the PCN/HCN dichotomy widely used in the international staffing literature needs to take account of the following issues: First: The study confirms theoretical assumptions based on social capital theory that subsidiaries led by HCNs are more embedded in the host country's external environment (by having more frequent relationships with host country customers, suppliers and competitors). However, the study reveals that the assumed advantages PCN led subsidiaries have with headquarters do not extend to their relationships with competitors in other parts of the MNC. Second: HCN led subsidiaries are more autonomous than PCN led subsidiaries with regard to operational and strategic decisions that relate to the market issues (market areas supplied, product range) and with respect to the local institutional environment (HRM). Our study finds that this is also the case with regard to strategic decisions on financial control as well as on R&D and new product development. Third: On average, HCN led subsidiaries perform significantly better than PCN led subsidiaries with regard to sales growth by value, productivity and innovation. This is in line with the findings of Beechler et al. (2005), the only other study investigating European subsidiaries. It also confirms the study of Konopaske et al. (2002). However, it contradicts the findings of Segiguchi et al. (2011) and Bebenroth and Li (2010) on the same matter.

Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/83652/1/768045681.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:imbwps:74

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute of Management Berlin (IMB) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().