The Need to Improve National Pension Fund Governance Structure
Heesuk Yun,
Dohyung Kim and
Jonghoon Kim
No 2015-02(K), KDI Policy Studies from Korea Development Institute (KDI)
Abstract:
The National Pension Fund (NPF) is projected to grow enormously beyond the depth of the capital market in Korea. Future developments in the fund size raise concerns over the current management’s capability to handle the huge amount of domestic investments and its expertise required for diversification into overseas investment. There have been discussions for reforming the NPF governance with an emphasis on the need for increasing the rate of return on investment. However, the previous attempts to reform governance have been futile owing to prevailing distrust in the financial experts who will control pension funds. To advance the reform discussion further, it would be necessary to first establish the principles in designing pension fund governance structure. Above all, the top-notch financiers should be employed to achieve an optimal combination of risk and return in pension fund portfolio, but the set of the optimal combinations should be given beforehand from the highest level of governance. At the same time, the concerns over the potential conflict of interest among the fiduciaries should be adequately addressed by implementing a strong accountability framework. One way to ensuring accountability is to set the long-term fiscal target of the National Pension Service (NPS). The long-term investment return of the Fund derived from the long-term fiscal target should provide the fund managers a clear mandate that guides their investment strategies. Hence, setting the fiscal target, which provides a link between the pension system and the pension fund governance, may be the first step to advancing the governance structure of the National Pension Fund. A major overhaul of the Committee is also necessary. A new governing body independent of the government and the NPS, and consisting of the members having professional experiences and appropriate expertise should be established to control and oversee fund management effectively. Finally, the governing body and the management have to be subject to regular external audit. As the duties and liabilities of the fiduciaries are statutory, the board members need be granted a legal authority to evaluate the staff and provide them a proper incentive for better performance.
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:kdipol:v:2015-02(k):y:2015:p:1-116
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in KDI Policy Studies from Korea Development Institute (KDI) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().