Indigenous nations and the development of the US economy: Land, resources, and dispossession

Ann Carlos, Donna Feir and Angela Redish

No 21-04, QUCEH Working Paper Series from Queen's University Belfast, Queen's University Centre for Economic History

Abstract: Abundant land and strong property rights are conventionally viewed as key factors underpinning US economic development success. This view relies on the "Pristine Myth" of an empty undeveloped land. But the abundant land of North America was already made productive and was the recognized territory of sovereign Indigenous Nations. We demonstrate that the development of strong property rights for European/American settlers was mirrored by the attenuation and increasing disregard of Indigenous property rights and that the dearth of discussion of the dispossession of Indigenous nations results in a misunderstanding of some of the core themes of US economic history.

Keywords: indigenous peoples; development of the American economy; Institutions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: N40 N41 N50 N51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env and nep-his
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/234901/1/1760702145.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Indigenous Nations and the Development of the U.S. Economy: Land, Resources, and Dispossession (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:qucehw:201204

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in QUCEH Working Paper Series from Queen's University Belfast, Queen's University Centre for Economic History Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().