Lean macroprudentialism and the centrality of resolution: Why Europe's ex ante framework cannot deliver stability

Vincent Lindner and Loriana Pelizzon

No 110, SAFE Policy Letters from Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE

Abstract: This paper argues that the European macroprudential regime has evolved into a complex architecture of buffers, national discretion, and instrument-specific controls due to persistent doubts regarding the credibility of the EU bank resolution regime. Moreover, macroprudential controls are structurally constrained by the dynamics of financial innovation, particularly the rapid growth of non-bank financial intermediaries (NBFIs), which continually move risk outside the traditional regulatory perimeter. In such an environment, ex ante macroprudential tools can at best respond to the last innovation but can never anticipate the next one. Thus, macroprudential policy should be lean and focused. If political capital for a major reform is available, it should be directed towards strengthening the resolution regime, which is the only institutional mechanism capable of disciplining risk-taking ex ante and providing stability ex post.

Keywords: Macroprudential Regulation; Resolution Regime; NBFIs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/333936/1/194598435X.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:safepl:333936

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SAFE Policy Letters from Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().