How not to do banking law in the 21st century

Tobias Tröger ()

No 56, SAFE Policy Letters from Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE

Abstract: The Judgement of the EGC in the Case T-122/15 - Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg - Förderbank v European Central Bank is the first statement of the European judiciary on the sub-stantive law of the Banking Union. Beyond its specific holding, the decision is of great importance, because it hints at the methodological approach the EGC will take in interpreting prudential banking regulation in the appeals against supervisory measures that fall in its jurisdiction under TFEU, arts. 256(1) subpara 1 and 263(4). Specifically, the case pertained to the scope of direct ECB oversight of significant banks in the euro area and the reassignment of this competence to national competent authorities (NCAs) in individual circumstances (Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) Regulation, art. 6(4) subpara 2; SSM Framework Regulation, arts. 70, 71).

Keywords: Banking Union; ECB; EGC; Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg; NCAs; SSM (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cba, nep-eec and nep-law
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/162592/1/89095979X.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:safepl:56

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SAFE Policy Letters from Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().