Financial resilience revisited: Why consistency in regulation is now paramount - across sectors and regions, and over time
Franklin Allen,
Jan Pieter Krahnen and
Helene Rey
No 1, SAFE Policy Reports from Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE
Abstract:
In this paper we propose a way forward towards increased financial resilience in times of growing disagreement concerning open borders, free trade and global regulatory standards. In light of these concerns, financial resilience remains a highly valued policy objective. We wish to contribute by suggesting an agenda of concrete, do-able steps supporting an enhanced level of resilience, combined with a deeper understanding of its relevance in the public domain. First, remove inconsistencies across regulatory rules and territorial regimes, and ensure their credibility concerning implementation. Second, discourage the use of financial regulatory standards as means of international competition. Third, give more weight to pedagogically explaining the established regulatory standards in public, to strengthen their societal backing.
Keywords: financial resilience; free trade; global regulatory standards (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/213038/1/SAFE-Policy-Report-1.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Financial resilience revisited: Why consistency in regulation is now paramount - across sectors and regions, and over time (2017) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:safepr:n1
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in SAFE Policy Reports from Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().