Hurdles still outweigh opportunities for bioCDR
Nils Matzner,
Danny Otto,
Christine Polzin,
Jennifer Hauck,
Johannes Förster,
Ronja Wollnik,
Daniela Siedschlag and
Daniela Thrän
No 4/2025, UFZ Discussion Papers from Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS)
Abstract:
How are different processes for removing CO2 from the atmosphere perceived by stakeholders in different regions of Germany? This question was explored in workshops of the project BioNET ("Multistage assessment of biobased negative emission technologies")1 in order to beter understand the potential and challenges of biomass-based carbon dioxide removal (bioCDR) technologies. Experts from industry, agriculture, forestry, NGOs and policy were involved in four stakeholder workshops to discuss bioCDR measures, their regional characteristics and sociopolitical trust. The results show that bioCDR technologies such as afforestation, pyrolysis of biomass (PyCCS) and peatland rewetting are seen as promising, but face regulatory, economic and social barriers. While there are regional differences in feasibility, there are recurring challenges such as land competition, lack of political support and uncertainties in financing. Particular emphasis was placed on the importance of cascading use in order to maximize the efficiency of bioCDR. The "Carbon Cascadia" simulation game we developed supported the discussion on biomass cascades and long-term CO2 storage. The results highlight the need for targeted funding instruments and a coordinated policy framework, including citizen participation, in order to establish bioCDR in the long term. Without clear strategies and societal involvement, there is a risk that the potential of these technologies will remain untapped. The report provides valuable insights for research, policy and practice for the further development of bioCDR in Germany.
Keywords: biomass; climate policy; stakeholders; carbon dioxide removal; negative emissions; biomass-based carbon dioxide removal (bioCDR) technologies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/328003/1/1937615537.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:328003
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in UFZ Discussion Papers from Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().