For "better" or "worse": a direct approach to elicit preference rankings from life-satisfaction data

Sonja Köke and Grischa Perino

No 43, WiSo-HH Working Paper Series from University of Hamburg, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, WISO Research Laboratory

Abstract: We provide empirical evidence that intra-personal changes in life-satisfaction are a biased measure of preference rankings and, as a remedy, propose the ranking measure where subjects state whether their life has become "better" or "worse". Three representative datasets reveal: intra-personal changes in satisfaction levels are dominated by noise and less well explained by socio-economic variables than the ranking measure; the deviation between the two measures is systematic and adaptation (e.g. to income and unemployment) is only observed for changes in satisfaction levels but not for rankings, indicating that adaptation is driven by the elicitation method rather than changes in preferences.

Keywords: Life satisfaction; preference rankings; adaptation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C83 I31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/260446/1/wp43.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:uhhwps:43

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in WiSo-HH Working Paper Series from University of Hamburg, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, WISO Research Laboratory Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().