 Hoechst challenges received wisdom on organizational learningAriane Berthoin Antal, Camilla Krebsbach-Gnath and Meinolf Dierkes Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization from WZB Berlin Social Science Center Abstract: How does a major international company learn? In particular, how does a successful international company even discover that it needs to learn to do things differently, and to do different things, rather than relying on its past recipes for success? According to the literature, success tends to be a hindrance for learning, while crises tend to stimulate it by calling into question existing ways of seeing and doing things. The analysis of the far-ranging transformation of Hoechst into Aventis in the years 1994 to 2000 challenges and refines some concepts in the literature on organizational learning. The case illustrates how learning was triggered in a successful organization without waiting for a crisis, how double-loop learning was achieved through mergers and acquisitions, and how unlearning was managed in divestments. The paper modifies theories on the nature of visions and the role of top managers in creating visions, and it breaks some new ground in the exploration of the role of organizational politics in organizational learning processes. Date: 2003 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:wzbior:spiii2003102 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization from WZB Berlin Social Science Center Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.