Economics at your fingertips  

Do new labour activation policies work? A descriptive analysis of the German Hartz reforms

Jens Alber and Jan Paul Heisig

Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Inequality and Social Integration from WZB Berlin Social Science Center

Abstract: The German Hartz reforms, introduced by the Red-Green coalition government in the years 2003 to 2005, form part of a broader pattern of European activation policies which have become known as new labour policies. The idea of these reforms was to reduce welfare dependency and to boost activity rates by making work pay, and by transforming the welfare state from a passive instrument of social protection to an enabling social investment that fosters universal labour force participation as the ultimate form of social inclusion. The German variety of these policies abolished earnings-related benefits to the long-term unemployed, partly fused the unemployment compensation scheme with the minimum income social assistance scheme and increased activating pressures on ablebodied people at working age by combining new sanctions with an extension of placement services. Based on a description of the relevant institutional changes, we show that means-tested benefits have become the major form of social transfer payments to the unemployed. The reforms also entailed a massive growth in German employment and especially in low-wage employment. As non-standard forms of employment proliferated, growing proportions of economically active people joined the ranks of the working poor by combining earnings from work with means-tested in-work benefits. Based on survey data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP), we show that the working poor enjoy higher life satisfaction, social integration and civic engagement than the nonworking poor. However, these individual and social benefits of employment critically depend on pay levels and overall job quality, as our own analyses confirm for the case of men's life satisfaction. The welfare gains achieved by Germany's recent reforms may therefore be smaller than suggested by employment rates alone, because people near the poverty line are now more willing to make concessions and to accept job offers even if the jobs they get are of minor quality.

Keywords: Minimum income support; unemployment compensation; labour market reforms; Hartz reform; activation policy; social inclusion; recommodification; working and non-working poor; Mindestsicherung; Arbeitslosenunterstützung; Arbeitsmarktreformen; Hartz-Reform; Aktivierungspolitik; soziale Inklusion und Teilhabe; Rekommodifizierung; arbeitende und nicht arbeitende Arme (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I38 J68 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eec, nep-eur and nep-lab
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Inequality and Social Integration from WZB Berlin Social Science Center Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().

Page updated 2023-11-08
Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbisi:spi2011211