Gender differences in tournament choices: Risk preferences, overconfidence or competitiveness?
Roel van Veldhuizen
No SP II 2016-207, Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior from WZB Berlin Social Science Center
A large number of recent experimental studies show that women are less likely to sort into competitive environments. While part of this effect may be explained by gender differences in risk attitudes and overconfidence, previous studies have attributed the majority of the gender gap to gender differences in a separate 'competitiveness' trait. We re-examine this result using a powerful novel experimental technique that allows us to separate competitiveness from alternative explanations by experimental design. In contrast to the literature, the results from our experiment imply that the whole gender gap is driven by risk attitudes and overconfidence. We show that our results are due to our experimental approach, which circumvents concerns raised against the regression-based method used by previous studies. Our results have important implications for policy and future research.
Keywords: Tournament; Experimental Design; Gender; Competitiveness; Lab Experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C90 J16 J24 J31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp, nep-gen and nep-lma
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (6) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:wzbmbh:spii2016207
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior from WZB Berlin Social Science Center Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().