Urban primacy, gigantism, and international trade: Evidence from Asia and the Americas

Ronald Moomaw and Mohammed A. Alwosabi

No B 20-2003, ZEI Working Papers from University of Bonn, ZEI - Center for European Integration Studies

Abstract: Gustavsson [1999] finds that policies that promote international trade increase the size of a country’s largest city relative to the country’s total population, which is defined here as an increase in urban gigantism. In contrast, Ades and Glaeser [1995] report urban gigantism is reduced by freer political institutions and, with less confidence, more open trade. In light of Henderson’s (2000) findings that excessive urban concentration inhibits economic growth, these conflicting results for the relationship between openness and urban gigantism (concentration), which are of great interest for the new economic geography, call for additional study. This study uses two measures of urban concentration and finds that lower international-trade costs are associated with lower primacy, but not with lower gigantism. Unlike Gustavsson, however, we find no evidence that lower trade costs increase gigantism.

Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/39550/1/379202131.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Urban Primacy, Gigantism, and International Trade: Evidence from Asia and the Americas (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:zeiwps:b202003

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ZEI Working Papers from University of Bonn, ZEI - Center for European Integration Studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().