The as-is journal review process: Let authors own their ideas

Eric W. K. Tsang and Bruno Frey

No 280, IEW - Working Papers from Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich

Abstract: Recently, the problems associated with the existing journal review process aroused discussions from seasoned management researchers, who have also made useful suggestions for improving the process. To complement these suggestions, we propose a more radical change: a manuscript should be reviewed on an �as is� basis and its fate be determined in one round of review. The as-is review process shortens the time period from submission to final acceptance, reduces the workload of editors, referees and authors, provides frank author feedback to referees, and, most important, lets authors own all of the ideas in their publications.

Keywords: Journals; reviews; authors; submissions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Z0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-sog
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/52237/1/iewwp280.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: The as-is journal review process: Let authors own their ideas (2006)
Working Paper: The as-is journal review process: Let authors own their ideas (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zur:iewwpx:280

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IEW - Working Papers from Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Severin Oswald ().