How Effective is Public Policy in Decreasing Soda Consumption? An Assessment of Four Policy Options

Yizao Liu (), Rigoberto Lopez and Chen Zhu

No 19, Working Papers from University of Connecticut, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Charles J. Zwick Center for Food and Resource Policy

Abstract: This paper examines the effectiveness of four policy options to decrease the consumption of carbonated soft drinks (CSDs). They are: (1) a soda tax (1 cent per ounce), (2) a ban on television advertising, (3) limiting calories to 100 per 12 oz volume; and (4) banning large containers such as the 2 lt. bottle. We apply the Berry, Levinsohn and Pakes (1995) demand model to data for 12 CSD brands in 3 container sizes over seven cities and 36 months to estimate consumers’ preferences for CSD. Limiting the size of containers (e.g., banning the 2 lt. bottle) was found to be the most effective policy option and a tax on calories was found to be the weakest in terms of effectiveness in decreasing the consumption of CSDs. The declines in the national consumption of CSDs were found to be approximately -6.3%, -15.4%, -15.5% and -15.8 for a tax, advertising ban, limiting calories, and restricting container sizes, respectively.

Keywords: advertising; demand; policy; taxes; obesity; consumer behavior; sodas; carbonated soft drinks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D12 I18 L66 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 19 pages
Date: 2013-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mkt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cag.uconn.edu/are/zwickcenter/documents/workingpapers/wp19.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www.cag.uconn.edu:80 (No such host is known. )

Related works:
Working Paper: How Effective is Public Policy in Decreasing Soda Consumption? An Assessment of Four Policy Options (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zwi:wpaper:19

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Connecticut, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Charles J. Zwick Center for Food and Resource Policy Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().