Industrial and Organizational Psychology

2008 - 2025

From Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing (csjnls@cambridge.org).

Access Statistics for this journal.
Is something missing from the series or not right? See the RePEc data check for the archive and series.

Volume 18, issue 1, 2025

Revisiting Keynes’ predictions about work and leisure: A discussion of fundamental questions about the nature of modern work pp. 1-22

Seth A. Kaplan, John A. Aitken, Blake A. Allan, George M. Alliger, Timothy Ballard and Hannes Zacher

Balancing work, well-being, and psychological needs in a technological society pp. 23-26

Adysen E. Cohen, Karina A. Soto and Mia C. Tamerian

Working standard hours, but at what cost? How the 40-hour work week disproportionately impacts minoritized employees pp. 27-31

Heavenlei A. Thomas

Was Keynes thwarted by consumerism? Insatiable needs, voluntary simplicity, and the pursuit of leisure pp. 32-34

Michael B. Harari, Deborah Searcy and Sara Alshareef

Whose interests should technology serve? Employees versus shareholders pp. 35-39

Traci Sitzmann, Kimberly A. French and Keaton A. Fletcher

Implications of Keynes’ prediction for low-wage workers pp. 40-42

Josie C. Zachman

Gender roles in Keynes’ predictions: Progress or stagnation? pp. 43-46

Makai A. Ruffin, Karyssa A. Courey and Margaret E. Beier

Work is dead, long live work: I-O’s role in redefining a postwork society pp. 47-53

Christopher W. Wiese

The power of flexibility pp. 54-57

Allison Halpin, Anna Meerson, Cailey Schmitt and Khang Doan

Economic inequality drives longer work hours pp. 58-61

Mindy Shoss and Tara Behrend

Work can be good; not all work is good—let’s make it better pp. 62-66

Christopher J. L. Cunningham and Emma Vosika

Where Keynes went wrong: Pay equity pp. 67-70

Joel Lefkowitz

Scarcity as a motive of work pp. 71-74

Jon Murphy and Ann-Marie R. Castille

The AI revolution and the future of work hours: Reevaluating Keynes’ prediction pp. 75-79

Paresh Mishra and Gregory Lynn Hill

The cost of cutting hours: How government regulation can stifle productivity and competitiveness pp. 80-83

Yannick Griep, William G. Obenauer and Wieke Knol

Workplace learning and the future of work pp. 84-109

Margaret E. Beier, Mahima Saxena, Kurt Kraiger, David P. Costanza, Cort W. Rudolph, David M. Cadiz, Gretchen A. Petery and Gwenith G. Fisher

Navigating uncertainty: Challenges and solutions for person-centered workplace learning in a rapidly changing world pp. 110-114

Paresh Mishra and Gregory Lynn Hill

Climate change as a catalyst for economic inequality: The failure of workplace learning in the global south pp. 115-118

Yannick Griep

Addressing labor gaps with the science of workplace learning pp. 119-122

Layla Dang, Daphne Xin Hou, Kevin A. Hoff and Tara S. Behrend

Ageism in disguise: How lifelong learning demands may marginalize older workers pp. 123-127

Yannick Griep, Wieke M. Knol and Hannes Zacher

The future of work and learning hinges on social and relational processes pp. 128-133

Rebecca Storey, Sibley F. Lyndgaard and Ruth Kanfer

Curiosity is the key to the future of learning and development pp. 134-138

Jay H. Hardy

Adapting to the future: How microcredentials fuel self-directed learning in the evolving workplace pp. 139-142

Paige L. Peterson and Cody B. Cox

Self-regulated learning: A person-centric approach to training pp. 143-146

Traci Sitzmann and Kristina N. Bauer

Learning in the flow of work: Designing person-centric learning experiences with just-in-time microlearning pp. 147-150

Mary Chacko and Cody B. Cox

When you learn, you grow: Concretizing person-centricity in workplace learning pp. 151-155

Joanna Kuczynska, Annemarie Künn-Nelen and Bram P. I. Fleuren

Person-centered learning: The future is here and it’s not pretty, but it can be pp. 156-161

Keaton A. Fletcher and Alexis R. Kennedy

An entrepreneurial roadmap for the future of workplace learning pp. 162-166

Alexander Glosenberg, Michael M. Gielnik and Paul R. Steffens

Volume 17, issue 4, 2024

Quantifying the scientist–practitioner gap: How do small business owners react to our academic articles? pp. 379-398

Steven Zhou, Lauren N.P. Campbell and Shea Fyffe

Not all “small business” is the same, and I-O has shoulders to stand on pp. 399-401

Alice Brawley Newlin

A panel discussion on addressing the science–practice gap with academic–industry collaborations pp. 402-405

Daniel M. Ravid, Wu, I-Heng (Ray), Emily D. Campion, Georgi P. Yankov, Richard N. Landers and Chase A. Winterberg

Let me in: Building an I-O bridge that combats the subtle redlining of the scientist–practitioner gap pp. 406-411

Henri T. Maindidze, Laura Brooks Dueland, Jason G. Randall and Aisha Taylor

Small businesses, the labor market, and the industrialized world pp. 412-413

Alex de Voogt

Beyond organizational size: Recommendations for addressing the scientist–practitioner gap pp. 414-417

Joseph W. Stewart and Greg Haudek

The right time, the right place: Collectively aligning I-O research with small business needs pp. 418-421

Kent K. Alipour and Andrew O. Herdman

Enhancing the relevance and practicality of I-O psychology for small businesses through organizational-based participatory research pp. 422-425

Myia S. Williams

Bridging from I-O to small business owners: Entrepreneurship as an allied discipline pp. 426-429

Gavin Williamson

We need to find out where small businesses find information first pp. 430-433

Gordon B. Schmidt and Aditya Simha

Bridging the gap through innovation: Startups required to tackle the scientist–practitioner divide pp. 434-438

Henrik Heinemann and Philipp Schäpers

The scientist–practitioner gap: A call to end the debate pp. 439-442

Mark Stroud

Making the abstract concrete: A case for structured abstracts in organizational sciences pp. 443-448

Sydney Marie Roux and Vanessa Burke

Industrial-organizational psychology research is useful for small businesses pp. 449-451

James W. Beck

Under attack: Why and how I-O psychologists should counteract threats to DEI in education and organizations pp. 452-475

Kayla Brooke Follmer, Isaac E. Sabat, Kristen P. Jones and Eden King

Microaffirmations: Strategic acts that disrupt inequality pp. 476-480

Lorena Solis, Aylime Bueno and Mostafa Dastgheib

Strategic responses to anti-DEI legislation: The promise of culturally responsive assessments pp. 481-485

Emily Gallegos, Katrisha M. Smith, Juveria Syed, Ricardo R. Brooks and Michelle P. Martín-Raugh

Counteracting the threats to DEI: The answer is accountability pp. 486-489

Cody B. Cox and Michelle N. Nguyen

Minding the gap: Mindful inclusion of opposing perspectives to protect DEI initiatives pp. 490-494

Larry R. Martinez, Nicholas A. Smith, Sophia D. Ortiz, Megan Korsak and Tennessee Day

Counteracting threats to DEI with good trouble and innovation pp. 495-498

William G. Obenauer

More than I-O, more than admissions: Partnering for DEI in graduate education pp. 499-502

Morrie Mullins, Jennifer Gibson, Jennifer Phillips, Stacey Raj, Victoria White and Alejandra Gonzalez

The unequal burden of DEI bans pp. 503-506

Lindsay Y. Dhanani, David F. Arena and Sean M. Bogart

Cutting the cord: Good riddance to ineffective DEI programs pp. 507-510

Denise Robb and Sarah Rana

Depoliticizing DEI: Path to fulfillment of its core values and effective implementation pp. 511-515

Hwayeon Myeong

Igniting progress: SIOP’s role in advocating DEI policy change pp. 516-519

Rebecca Harmata, Nohelia Argote, Reggie Romain and Jennifer Feitosa

Activism or science? Navigating the tension between objectivity and advocacy in DEI research pp. 520-524

Logan M. Steele and Paul E. Spector

Don’t get bogged down by the backlash pp. 525-529

Traci Sitzmann, Gisella Bassani and Mary Lee Stansifer

Not all “small business” is the same, and I-O has shoulders to stand on – CORRIGENDUM pp. 530-530

Alice Brawley Newlin

Volume 17, issue 3, 2024

Selection tests work better than we think they do, and have for years pp. 269-282

Jeff L. Foster, Piers Steel, Peter D. Harms, O’Neill, Thomas A. and Dustin Wood

Do selection tests “really” work better than we think they do? pp. 283-287

S. Burak Ozkum

External practitioner perspectives on validating selection tools against performance ratings pp. 288-291

Chase A. Winterberg and Greg Haudek

Making selection tests work better for disabled job applicants pp. 292-295

Dustin Maneethai and Lars U. Johnson

Operational validity/correlation coefficients are still valid for evaluating selection procedure effectiveness pp. 296-302

In-Sue Oh and Huy Le

Same as it ever was: A clarification on the sources of predictable variance in job performance ratings pp. 303-308

Paul R. Sackett, Dan J. Putka and Brian J. Hoffman

On putting the horse (raters and criteria) before the cart (variance components in ratings) pp. 309-313

Pengda Wang, Hwayeon Myeong and Frederick L. Oswald

E Pluribus Unum? Why criteria should be multimethod and multirater pp. 314-318

Jeffrey M. Cucina and Theodore L. Hayes

Personality and rater bias: How personality traits influence rater bias and training proficiency pp. 319-321

Kassandra Diaz

Decoding variance and predictive ability in selection systems: An application of Gauthier’s framework of rater cognitions pp. 322-325

Peyton Anderson

Quiet environments and the intentional practice of silence: Toward a new perspective in the analysis of silence in organizations pp. 326-340

Alexandre Asselineau, Gilles Grolleau and Naoufel Mzoughi

Realizing the benefits of quiet environments: Culture matters pp. 341-343

David K. Palmer and Michelle M. Fleig-Palmer

Finding balance: Silence and nature in employee restoration pp. 344-346

Marissa Lagera, Rafael Segovia and Camila Loudermilk

Building on top the “architects of silence” pp. 347-349

Munkhjin Bat-Ireedui

Breaking the sound barrier: Quiet spaces may also foster inclusivity for the neurodiverse community pp. 350-352

Cody B. Cox, Lesly R. Krome and Gregory J. Pool

Enjoy the silence: Providing space for introverted employees to thrive pp. 353-356

Mallory A. McCord

Embracing silence: Creating inclusive spaces for autistic employees pp. 357-359

Joanna Maria Szulc

Sound sensitivities in the “quiet” environment: Implications and strategies for management pp. 360-365

Rob Austin McKee, Zahir I. Latheef and Whitney Botsford Morgan

Toward a culturally sensitive perspective on silence in organizations pp. 366-370

Yang, Zhixu (Rick) and Franki Y. H. Kung

Leveraging quiet: The power of choosing your workspace pp. 371-374

Hanna Kalmanovich-Cohen and Steven J. Stanton

The ART of mindfulness skills in making the most of intentional silence at work pp. 375-378

Grace Lemmon, Goran Kuljanin, Jennifer D. Golden and Kevin P. Taylor

Volume 17, issue 2, 2024

Assessment centers: Reflections, developments, and empirical insights pp. 149-153

Duncan J. R. Jackson, Michael D. Blair and Pia V. Ingold

Assessment centers do not measure competencies: Why this is now beyond reasonable doubt pp. 154-175

Chris Dewberry

Inclusive leadership as a valid assessment center dimension pp. 176-191

Anna N. Hoover and Deborah E. Rupp

Any slice is predictive? On the consistency of impressions from the beginning, middle, and end of assessment center exercises and their relation to performance pp. 192-205

Pia V. Ingold, Anna Luca Heimann and Simon M. Breil

Beyond rating accuracy: Unpacking frame-of-reference assessor training effectiveness pp. 206-219

C. Allen Gorman, Duncan J. R. Jackson, John P. Meriac, Joseph R. Himmler and Tanya F. Contreras

Perceptions of assessment center exercises: Between exercises differences and interventions pp. 220-232

Sylvia G. Roch

An ethical leadership assessment center pilot: Assessing and developing moral person and moral manager dimensions pp. 233-251

d’Amato, Alexis, Vignesh Murugavel, Kelsey Medeiros and Logan L. Watts

An epistemology for assessment and development: How do we know what we know? pp. 252-268

Deborah E. Rupp, George C. Thornton, Tiffany M. Bisbey, Anna N. Hoover, Eduardo Salas and Kevin R. Murphy

Volume 17, issue 1, 2024

Anti-work offers many opportunities for I-O psychologists pp. 1-30

George M. Alliger and Peter J. McEachern

Does the antiwork perspective contribute to understanding and improving the nature of work? pp. 31-35

Joel Lefkowitz

What is work to you? Empowering workers and changing perspectives pp. 36-38

Bradley Brummel and P.D. Harms

Estranged, nauseated, or fulfilled? Existentialism as bridge between antiwork and I-O psychology pp. 39-44

Bram P. I. Fleuren, Charlotte Rodriguez Conde and Rachel E. Gifford

The role of work psychologists in the development of antiwork sentiments pp. 45-49

Goran Kuljanin and Grace Lemmon

From antiwork to disorganizational psychology pp. 50-52

Nathan Gerard

Antiwork highlights the need for humanism in I-O psychology pp. 53-57

Melissa B. Gutworth

Addressing antiwork concerns through nonwork identity: Beyond an emphasis on meaningful work pp. 58-60

Christina Christodoulou, Edileide Oliveira, Maryam Baloch and Rick Laguerre

Working against the current: What different groups can teach us about antiwork pp. 61-64

Jacqueline R. Wong and Rebecca M. Brossoit

Antiwork or antimaster? Reframing the antiwork movement through a racial lens pp. 65-69

Hayden Nelson, Elizabeth Curtis, Tamia Eugene, Cora E. Hurt, Molly R. Simmons and Katrina A. Burch

One opportunity of antiwork: Bringing unions (back) to the I-O table pp. 70-74

Denise Vesper, Joanna Grzymala-Moszczynska, Cornelius J. König, David Martínez-Iñigo, Magnus Sverke and Michael J. Zickar

Entrepreneurship: an extension to anti-work perspectives pp. 75-78

Shanshan Qian, Chao Miao and Ronald H. Humphrey

A tale of two antiworks pp. 79-84

Amber M. Olson, Justin A. DeSimone, Maura J. Mills, Michael T. Ford and Seth Butler

Best practices for weight at work research pp. 85-105

Grace Lemmon, Jaclyn M. Jensen and Goran Kuljanin

The science of weight controllability: Implications and future directions for weight at work research pp. 106-110

Erin C. Standen and Traci Mann

The weight of beauty in psychological research pp. 111-114

Hwayeon Myeong, Pengda Wang and Eden B. King

Organizational research on weight stigma must center targets’ perspectives pp. 115-120

Brielle N. Johnson and Jonathan W. Kunstman

Acknowledging the ramifications of weight-based stereotype threat in the workplace pp. 121-125

Matthew J. Gerson

Importance of considering intersectionality when studying weight at work pp. 126-132

Jocelyn G. Anker, Nina Carmichael-Tanaka and Lillian T. Eby

Twinks, jocks, and bears—oh my! The stereotype content model extended to gay men and weight at work pp. 133-137

Joseph Alexander Carpini and Aleksandra Luksyte

Beneficial role of mindfulness interventions in reducing weight stigma pp. 138-141

Tao Yang

Becoming and acting as an ally against weight-based discrimination pp. 142-147

Christopher J. Waterbury, Larry R. Martinez, Liana Bernard and Nicholas A. Smith