Who Wants To Revise Privatization? The Complementarity of Market Skills and Institutions

Irina Denisova (), Markus Eller, Timothy Frye and Ekaterina Zhuravskaya
Additional contact information
Irina Denisova: Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), Moscow

No w0127, Working Papers from New Economic School (NES)

Abstract: Using survey data from 28 transition countries, we test for the complementarity and substitutability of market-relevant skills and institutions. We show that democracy and good governance complement market skills in transition economies. Under autocracy and weak governance institutions there is no significant difference in support for revising privatization between high and low-skilled respondents. As the level of democracy and the quality of governance increases, the difference in the level of support for revising privatization between the high and low skilled grows dramatically. This finding contributes to our understanding of microfoundations of the politics of economic reform.

Pages: 46 pages
Date: 2009-04
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (38)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nes.ru/files/Preprints-resh/WP127.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Who Wants To Revise Privatization? The Complementarity of Market Skills and Institutions (2009)
Working Paper: Who Wants To Revise Privatization? The Complementarity of Market Skills and Institutions (2009)
Working Paper: Who Wants To Revise Privatization? The Complementarity of Market Skills and Institutions (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:abo:neswpt:w0127

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from New Economic School (NES) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vladimir Ivanyukhin ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).