Second-Order Representations: A Bayesian Approach
Ozgur Evren ()
Additional contact information
Ozgur Evren: New Economic School
No w0291, Working Papers from New Economic School (NES)
Abstract:
For choice problems under ambiguity, I provide a behavioral characterization of a decision maker who holds a second-order belief and updates it in a Bayesian fashion in response to new information concerning the true distribution of the states. The model features a unique second-order belief that can be elicited from choice data and is quite comprehensive in terms of ambiguity attitudes and risk preferences. Special versions, such as the smooth ambiguity model or the recursive non-expected utilitymodel, are easily characterized by additional assumptions on compound-risk preferences. Thereby, the model provides a testing ground to compare and contrast these well-known representations as well as alternative specifications that may be of interest. To illustrate potential benefits of alternative specifications, I provide a detailed analysis of a rank-dependent extension of the smooth ambiguity model.
Keywords: Ambiguity Aversion and Seeking; Ellsberg Paradox; Second-Order Belief; Probabilistic Sophistication; Bayesian Updating; Compound Risk JEL Classifications: D81; D83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 38 pages
Date: 2024-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm, nep-mic, nep-rmg and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nes.ru/files/Preprints-resh/WP291.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:abo:neswpt:w0291
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from New Economic School (NES) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vladimir Ivanyukhin ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).