Pooling with Essential and Nonessential Patents

Daniel Quint

American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2014, vol. 6, issue 1, 23-57

Abstract: Several recent technological standards were accompanied by patent pools?arrangements to license relevant intellectual property as a package. A key distinction made by regulators?between patents essential to a standard and patents with substitutes?has not been addressed in the theoretical literature. I show that pools of essential patents are always welfare increasing, while pools which include nonessential patents can be welfare reducing?even pools limited to complementary patents and stable under compulsory individual licensing. If pools gain commitment power and price as Stackelberg leaders, this reduces, and can reverse, the gains from welfare increasing pools.

JEL-codes: D43 D45 K21 L13 L24 O34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
Note: DOI: 10.1257/mic.6.1.23
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.6.1.23 (application/pdf)
http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mic/ds/0601/2012-0003_ds.zip (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:6:y:2014:i:1:p:23-57

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Journal: Microeconomics is currently edited by Johannes Hörner

More articles in American Economic Journal: Microeconomics from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().