Signing Out Confounding Shocks in Variance-Maximizing Identification Methods
Neville Francis and
Gene Kindberg-Hanlon
AEA Papers and Proceedings, 2022, vol. 112, 476-80
Abstract:
Recent papers have examined the dominant drivers of business cycles using variance-maximizing techniques for identification. However, identification is poor when shocks other than the target of interest play large roles in driving volatility at the targeted frequency or horizon, leading them to capture a "hybrid" shock. This paper suggests a simple fix that lowers biases in the impulse responses. The fix is to include theoretically informed sign and magnitude restrictions at the identification stage of the vector autoregression. Applying this to US data, we find an equal role for demand and supply shocks in generating business cycle fluctuations.
JEL-codes: C32 E23 E32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/pandp.20221046 (application/pdf)
https://doi.org/10.3886/E168681V1 (text/html)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/pandp.20221046.appx (application/pdf)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/pandp.20221046.ds (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:apandp:v:112:y:2022:p:476-80
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/subscribe.html
DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20221046
Access Statistics for this article
AEA Papers and Proceedings is currently edited by William Johnson and Kelly Markel
More articles in AEA Papers and Proceedings from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().