Evaluating Education Systems

Nicolas Gravel (), Edward Levavasseur and Patrick Moyes
Additional contact information
Edward Levavasseur: Aix-Marseille Université
Patrick Moyes: Université Bordeaux IV

No 13, CSH-IFP Working Papers from Centre de Sciences Humaines, New Delhi

Abstract: This paper proposes two dominance criteria for evaluating education systems described as joint distributions of the pupils’ cognitive skill achievements and family backgrounds. The first criterion is shown to be the smallest transitive ranking of education systems compatible with three elementary principles. The first principle requires any improvement in the cognitive skill of a child with a given family background to be recorded favorably. The second principle demands that any child’s cognitive skill be all the more favorably appraised as the child is coming from an unfavorable background. The third principle states that when two different skills and family backgrounds are allocated between two children, it is preferable that the high skill be given to the low background child than the other way around. The criterion considers system A to be better than system B when, for every pair of reference background and skill, the fraction of children with both a lower background and a better skill than the reference is larger in A than in B. Our second criterion completes the first by adding to the three principles the elitist requirement that a mean-preserving spread in the skills of two children with the same background be recorded favorably. We apply our criteria to the ranking of education systems of 43 countries, taking the PISA score in mathematics as the measure of cognitive skills and the largest of the two parents International Socio Economic Index as the indicator of background. We show that, albeit incomplete, our criteria enables conclusive comparisons of about 19% of all the possible pairs of countries. Education systems of fast-growing Asian economies – in particular Vietnam – appear at the top of our rankings while those of relatively wealthy Arabic countries such as Lebanon, United Arab Emirates and Jordan are at the bottom. The fraction of countries that can be ranked successfully happens to be only mildly increased as a result of adding elitism to the three other principles.

Keywords: Education; systems; evaluation; cognitive skills (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D63 I21 I23 O57 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 45 pages
Date: 2019-11, Revised 2019-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-sea
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in the CSH-IFP Working Papers series

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02291128/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Evaluating education systems (2021)
Working Paper: Evaluating education systems (2021)
Working Paper: Evaluating Education Systems (2019)
Working Paper: Evaluating Education Systems (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aed:wpaper:0013

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CSH-IFP Working Papers from Centre de Sciences Humaines, New Delhi Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CSH ().