Around and beyond the cheap talk script in Choice Experiments
Gianluca Grilli,
Notaro. Sandra and
Roberta Raffaelli
No 360726, 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association
Abstract:
Using a sample of respondents interviewed face-to-face while accessing a natural park in Sardinia (Italy), we conduct a Discrete Choice Experiment to assess respondents’ willingness to pay for improved environmental quality of the site. We assess the impact of four different strategies to mitigate hypothetical bias (soft cheap talk, honesty priming, consequentiality scripts, and solemn oath) and two elicitation methods (direct and inferred evaluation methods). Results indicate that none of the strategies were significantly effective in reducing HB. Conversely, inferred valuation led to significantly lower WTP estimates. The effect was especially large for attributes of pure public nature, while attributes that include utility from indirect use are less affected by elicitation method. Overall, the study suggests that inferred valuation is more effective than other strategy in removing social desirability of respondents.
Keywords: Environmental; Economics; and; Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 24
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/360726/files/7 ... aper_AAEA_Grilli.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:aaea25:360726
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.360726
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().