EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Cost-benefit analysis and the SPS Agreement

Jim Sinner

No 171901, 1999 Conference (43th), January 20-22, 1999, Christchurch, New Zealand from Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society

Abstract: The WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures requires member governments to base trade measures on scientific risk assessment. Relevant assessment factors include the costs of entry and establishment of pests, including costs of controlling such pests, but the benefits of importing risk goods appear to be excluded from consideration. This exclusion may be desirable in order to promote consistency and to reduce the chances of measures being used for protectionist purposes. However excluding benefits goes against economic logic, which suggests that both benefits and costs should be considered when choosing the appropriate level of protection from risk. The paper reviews recent economic literature on the use of cost-benefit analysis, the relevant clauses of the SPS Agreement, and recent rulings in disputes over SPS measures. Tensions between economics and the SPS Agreement are identified and a possible resolution is suggested.

Keywords: Demand and Price Analysis; Production Economics; Risk and Uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 20
Date: 1999-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/171901/files/Sinner.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:aare99:171901

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.171901

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in 1999 Conference (43th), January 20-22, 1999, Christchurch, New Zealand from Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search (aesearch@umn.edu).

 
Page updated 2024-12-28
Handle: RePEc:ags:aare99:171901