Leapfrogging Smart Meters: Permissionless Innovation, Electricity, and Consumers

Todd Myers

No 307173, Center for Growth and Opportunity at Utah State University from Center for Growth and Opportunity

Abstract: In 2009, Congress introduced the Smart Grid Investment Grant (SGIG) as part of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act, a stimulus package intended to help revert the effects of the recession. The SGIG was the largest program in the stimulus package, providing $3.4 billion of federal funding for building out a smart grid. Most of the projects that received funding through that grant program were centered around expanding the use of smart meters — a new electricity meter technology that reads energy use and relays that data back to the electricity provider. Smart meters were promised as a means of reducing electricity costs, improving user knowledge about their electricity use, and contributing to better environmental outcomes through lower electricity use at peak production hours. However, recent innovations in smart thermostat technology are proving to be much more effective at achieving those results without the implementation of a substantial federal program. Utilities such as Portland General Electric and Southern California Edison have reported that smart thermostats have proven to be more effective at reducing energy use than smart meters, in some instances reducing peak demand by 40 – 50 percent. In this policy paper author Todd Myers examines why smart thermostats have been more effective at reducing energy use than smart meters rolled out under SGIG. He concludes that rather than forcing specific technologies on consumers, policymakers should opt for approaches that engage consumer preferences and embrace innovative solutions.

Keywords: Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies; Resource/Energy Economics and Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 16
Date: 2020-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/307173/files/policy-paper-2020.001.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:cgouta:307173

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.307173

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Center for Growth and Opportunity at Utah State University from Center for Growth and Opportunity Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().