An empirical comparison of different risk measures in portfolio optimization

Lam Weng Hoe, Jaaman Saiful Hafizah and Isa Zaidi

Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), 2010, vol. 01, issue 01, 7

Abstract: Risk is one of the important parameters in portfolio optimization problem. Since the introduction of the mean-variance model, variance has become the most common risk measure used by practitioners and researchers in portfolio optimization. However, the mean-variance model relies strictly on the assumptions that assets returns are multivariate normally distributed or investors have a quadratic utility function. Many studies have proposed different risk measures to overcome the drawbacks of variance. The purpose of this paper is to discuss and compare the portfolio compositions and performances of four different portfolio optimization models employing different risk measures, specifically the variance, absolute deviation, minimax and semi-variance. Results of this study show that the minimax model outperforms the other models. The minimax model is appropriate for investors who have a strong downside risk aversion.

Keywords: Financial; Economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/95934/files/06 ... 20Weng_Hafizah_d.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:pdcbeh:95934

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.95934

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Business and Economic Horizons (BEH) from Prague Development Center (PRADEC) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().