Examining Nonresponse Occurring in the National Agricultural Statistics Service’s 2009 Agricultural Resource Management Survey Phase III

HoaiNam N. Tran, Michael W. Gerling, Melissa Mitchell, Rich Hopper and Terry O'Connor

No 234305, NASS Research Reports from United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Abstract: The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) surveys agricultural operations to provide timely, accurate, and useful statistics on the United States and Puerto Rico agriculture. The Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) program is composed of three phases. Phase I is the screening phase. Phase II focuses on chemical use and production practices on the targeted commodities. Phase III is the most complex and detailed sample survey data collections and pertains to the financial condition of the farm, including income, expenses, assets, and debt. Operator characteristics are also collected. This information is then compiled to obtain an overview of the financial well-being of the agricultural sector. ARMS Phase III (ARMS III) is the only phase with response rates lower than 80 percent and so is the focus of this study. The 2009 ARMS III sample was comprised of agricultural operations, across 48 states (excluding Alaska and Hawaii). Data collection was a mixture of mail, web, and personal field enumeration. For those operations failing to complete a questionnaire, personal enumeration was attempted. Upon a nonresponse occurrence, field enumerators were instructed to review a supplemental handout listing various nonresponse reasons and record the reason on the questionnaire that best fit the situation using a particular coding process. The results showed that the top three reasons for operations being coded as refusals are “Would not take time/too busy”, “Information too personal/intrusive, confidentiality concerns”, and “Respondent refuses on all surveys, and refused on this one”. The top three reasons for operations being coded as inaccessible are “Tried several times; could not reach anyone for an appointment.”, “The operator is away on vacation or business.”, and “No operation or respondent, as listed on the label, could be found. No structure exists.”

Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy; Research Methods/Statistical Methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 125
Date: 2012-04
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/234305/files/A ... rt_2010_04-03-12.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:unasrr:234305

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.234305

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NASS Research Reports from United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().