Methodology for Small Area Estimation with Special Reference to a One-Number Agricultural Census and Confidentiality: Results for Selected Major Crops and States

Daniel A. Griffith

No 322808, NASS Research Reports from United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Abstract: This report describes a flexible methodology for calculating spatial autoregressive model-based small geographic estimates, illustrating its utility with substitution computations for the suppression code (D) in order to allow more complete data tabulations to be released. Post-stratification figures reported here differ from those published in the 1997 Census of Agriculture, which was conducted by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). Estimated census totals differ somewhat, for several agricultural items of interest, from official estimates based upon the ongoing NASS survey program and administrative data. These discrepancies can be attributed to nonsampling errors, timing and process differences. One such source of nonsampling error is underenumeration, resulting from some small farms not being on the census mail list. Figures reported here have been adjusted for such errors. Once the best estimates of agricultural commodities have been established, another concern is preserving confidentiality while releasing as much of the data as possible. This issue arises when these data are post-stratified into counties, for small geographic area tabulations. The text describes applications of the estimation methodology to principal agricultural commodities for Michigan and Tennessee that have been adjusted in order to align the agricultural census results with reliable official totals. It also describes comparisons between the spatial autoregressive and other model-based estimates. One important finding is that currently anyone with a working knowledge of estimators like those discussed here already is capable of generating quite accurate synthetic values from public domain databases, and then substituting them for suppressed values.

Keywords: Research; Methods/Statistical; Methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 48
Date: 1999-08
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/322808/files/RD-99-04.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:unasrr:322808

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.322808

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NASS Research Reports from United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().