Cost-Benefit Analysis of Timed A.I. and Natural Service in Beef Cattle

Andrew P. Griffith, Christopher N. Boyer, Justin D. Rhinehart and Courtney Carter

No 303636, Extension Reports from University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics

Abstract: Cattle breeders have long used natural service (NS) breeding (i.e., live bulls breeding cows as they naturally show heat), and it remains the predominant practice for most cow-calf producers. However, many cattle breeders have embraced the use of reproductive technologies such as artificial insemination (AI), estrus synchronization (ES) and embryo transfer (ET). The use of AI — more specifically timed AI (TAI; synchronized estrus to inseminate all cows in a group at the same time) — has garnered increased attention from seedstock and commercial producers over the past decade. There are several reasons producers have adopted AI including: • Access to genetics from sires that are cost prohibitive if purchasing a bull for natural service. • Selecting genetics from multiple bulls to complement individual cows in the same mating group. • Owning and managing fewer bulls. • Narrowing the time frame of calving for the herd. TAI has been widely adopted in beef production because it offers the benefits of AI, while reducing and concentrating the quantity of labor related to estrous detection (“checking heat”). Moreover, the modern ES protocols for TAI can shorten the calving season while increasing overall calving rate. Even with these positive attributes, and numerous other benefits, many producers still view TAI as cost prohibitive. Thus, it is imperative to compare the costs and benefits for both TAI and NS to determine which breeding program is the most ideal for a given scenario. Given the production benefits from TAI mentioned above, a clear indication of whether the production benefits exceed additional costs should be reached before deciding to implement this breeding technology in an operation. The objective of this paper is to compare the costs and revenues resulting from TAI against the costs and revenues resulting from NS breeding systems. These attributes will be compared across different size operations and across the typical range of pregnancy rates expected from application of a single TAI to begin the breeding season.

Keywords: Farm Management; Financial Economics; Livestock Production/Industries (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 11
Date: 2020-05-15
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/303636/files/W899.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:utaeer:303636

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.303636

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Extension Reports from University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().