Compliance in the Public versus the Private Realm: Economic Preferences, Institutional Trust and COVID-19 Health Behaviors

Henrike Sternberg (), Janina Isabel Steinert and Tim Büthe
Additional contact information
Henrike Sternberg: TUM School of Social Sciences and Technology, TUM School of Management, Hochschule für Politik at the Technical University of Munich
Janina Isabel Steinert: TUM School of Social Sciences and Technology, TUM School of Medicine, Hochschule für Politik at the Technical University of Munich
Tim Büthe: TUM School of Social Sciences and Technology, TUM School of Management, Hochschule für Politik at the Technical University of Munich, Duke University

Munich Papers in Political Economy from Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich

Abstract: To what extent do economic preferences and institutional trust predict compliance with physical distancing rules during the COVID-19 pandemic? We make a distinction between individual health behaviors in the public and the private domain (e.g., keeping a distance from strangers versus abstaining from private gatherings with friends) and examine whether the importance of risk, time, and social preferences as well as trust in science and the government differs across these two domains. Using structural equation modeling to analyze survey data from Germanys second wave of the pandemic (N=3,350), we reveal three major differences: First, reciprocity (especially positive reciprocity) seems essential for individual compliance in the public domain, but barely relevant in the private domain. Second, we find the opposite pattern for individuals’ degree of trust in the national government, which appears to matter predominantly for increasing compliance in the private domain. Third, social preferences are generally less important for compliance in the private domain, where individuals’ COVID-19-related threat perception is clearly the strongest predictor. From a policy perspective, our findings suggest that communication strategies aimed at spurring compliance may either need to be tailored to domain-specific circumstances or focus on those factors common across domains.

Keywords: Health behavior; Compliance; Economic preferences; Institutional trust; COVID-19; Physical distancing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D91 H12 H31 I12 I18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 33 pages
Date: 2023-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-soc
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cms.mgt.tum.de/fileadmin/mgt.tum.de/facult ... 523_workingpaper.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aiw:wpaper:28

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Munich Papers in Political Economy from Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MPPE ().