Anticipated versus Realized Benefits: Can Event Studies be Used to Predict the Impact of New Regulations?

Kara Reynolds

No 2006-02, Working Papers from American University, Department of Economics

Abstract: Economists often use event study methodology to evaluate the impact of new regulations on firms. This research investigates the degree to which event study methodology can provide useful information in this regard by studying how accurately markets predict the actual benefits associated with a new law.

Keywords: Byrd Amendment; Antidumping; Event Study (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 15 pages
Date: 2006-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-reg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.17606/1jqz-xx16 First version, 2006 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Anticipated versus Realized Benefits: Can Event Studies Be Used To Predict the Impact of New Regulations? (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:amu:wpaper:0206

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from American University, Department of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Meal ().