 Dead on arrival? Implicit stranded assets in leading IAM scenariosCameron Hepburn, Alexander Pfeiffer, Adrien Vogt-Schilb and Daniel J. Tulloch INET Oxford Working Papers from Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford Abstract: While it is acknowledged that asset stranding could jeopardize the political feasibility of climate policies, the amount of stranded assets is rarely made explicit in most decarbonization pathways. This paper introduces a novel method that extracts, for every given energy sector transition scenario, the implicit amount of new power generation capacity that is added every year, and the required amount of stranding if this scenario is to be in line with its projected generation mix. We show that most scenarios that stabilize warming to below 1.5-2°C require a high level of asset stranding, not only for future capacity additions, but also for already existing and currently planned generators. Such stranding affects China and the U.S. most. The amount of future fossil fuel capacity stranding required, in line with 1.5-2°C warming, has increased by 21% between 2005 and 2015. We discuss implications for investors and policy makers. Keywords: climate change mitigation; stranded assets; electricity generation; climate policy; energy policy (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:amz:wpaper:2018-08 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in INET Oxford Working Papers from Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.