Shareholder Voting and Corporate Governance
David Yermack ()
Additional contact information
David Yermack: Finance Department, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, NY 10012-1126
Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2010, vol. 2, issue 1, 103-125
Abstract:
This article reviews recent research into corporate voting and elections. Regulatory reforms have given shareholders more voting power in the election of directors and in executive compensation issues. Shareholders use voting as a channel of communication with boards of directors, and protest voting can lead to significant changes in corporate governance and strategy. Some investors have embraced innovative empty voting strategies for decoupling voting rights from cash flow rights, enabling them to mount aggressive programs of shareholder activism. Market-based methods have been used by researchers to establish the value of voting rights and show how this value can vary in different settings.
Keywords: empty voting; say on pay; shareholder activism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G23 G34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (68)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-financial-073009-104034 (application/pdf)
Full text downloads are only available to subscribers. Visit the abstract page for more information.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:anr:refeco:v:2:y:2010:p:103-125
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.annualreviews.org/action/ecommerce
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Annual Review of Financial Economics from Annual Reviews Annual Reviews 4139 El Camino Way Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by http://www.annualreviews.org ().