Competing terms for complementary concepts? Acceptance and legitimacy of low-carbon energy technologies

Sven Alsheimer (), Tamara Schnell (), Camilla Chlebna () and Sebastian Rohe
Additional contact information
Sven Alsheimer: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI, Breslauer Str. 48, 76139 Karlsruhe, Germany
Tamara Schnell: Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
Camilla Chlebna: Department for Geography, Kiel University, Ludewig-Meyn-Straße 8, 24118 Kiel, Germany

No 2023(10), GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions from GEIST Working Paper Series

Abstract: The large-scale deployment of low-carbon energy technologies is crucial for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and ideally limiting climate change. The success of this transition towards a carbon-neutral society depends on how these technologies are perceived by civil society and whether key societal stakeholders support or oppose their roll-out. Two major debates addressing this issue revolve around the concepts of acceptance and legitimacy. Acceptance literature examines the drivers and levels of support of novel technologies and socio-technical systems. Legitimacy literature captures how these technologies are aligned to their institutional environment. Thus far, there is little cross-fertilisation between the two debates. For this contribution, we conducted a systematic literature review of the two research streams to gain a better understanding of how the social dynamics of low-carbon energy technology deployment are conceptualised. Our review involved the analysis of 240 articles from SCOPUS that empirically studied the acceptance or legitimacy of low-carbon energy technologies. Our findings suggest that the two literature strands are indeed rather disconnected – few articles use both concepts conjointly. They further illustrate that both have distinct research foci and intellectual roots. Acceptance studies tend to focus on individual perspectives towards specific technologies and relate these to the individuals’ backgrounds. In contrast, legitimacy studies tend to focus on the overall alignment of specific technologies or entire innovation systems with the institutional context. Based on our findings, we propose a framework, to allow for a better understanding of the dynamic interplay between macro-level legitimacy evaluations and micro-level acceptance evaluations.

Keywords: Acceptance; Legitimacy; Public perceptions; Acceptability; Legitimation; Low-carbon energy technologies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-env, nep-hme and nep-ino
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.geist-wp.com/papers/geist_wp_2301.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aoe:wpaper:2301

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions from GEIST Working Paper Series
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Johan Miörner ().