Perceived Relative Income and Preferences for Public Good Provision
Anca Balietti,
Angelika Budjan and
Tillmann Eymess
No 729, Working Papers from University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics
Abstract:
Guided by a theoretical framework, we study how perceived relative income affects preferences for public goods. In a randomized survey experiment, we inform respondents from India of their official income rank and elicit preferences for air quality, including actual contributions to environmental initiatives. Right-wing supporters withdraw contributions when perceived relative income increases. The effect coincides with diminished health concerns and lower intentions to utilize private protection measures against air pollution. In contrast, center-left supporters do not reduce contributions. A second survey experiment demonstrates the causality of the relationship using a novel treatment that exogenously shifts relative income perceptions.
Keywords: perceived relative income; voluntary contributions; public goods; air pollution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-06-27
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env, nep-exp and nep-pub
Note: This paper is part of http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/view/schriftenreihen/sr-3.html
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heidok-334239 Frontdoor page on HeiDOK (text/html)
https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver ... ymess_2023_dp729.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:awi:wpaper:0729
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Gabi Rauscher ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).