Does a Modest Stipend Encourage Girls to Attend School beyond the 5th Class: Evidence from the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan?

Musharraf Cyan (), Michael Price (), Mark Rider and Stephanie J. Roberts ()
Additional contact information
Musharraf Cyan: Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, http://www.gsu.edu/
Michael Price: Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, http://www.gsu.edu/
Stephanie J. Roberts: Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, http://www.gsu.edu/

International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU from International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University

Abstract: According to a recent report by UNESCO (2012a), Pakistan has the second highest number of children in the world that are not attending school, despite increasing primary school net enrollment rates from 58 percent in 1999 to 74 percent in 2010. According to the same report, 25 percent of Pakistanis aged 7 to 16 in 2007 have never attended school. Furthermore, there is a significant education gender gap in Pakistan. Memon (2007) reports that for children enrolled in school, attendance rates are 20 percent higher for males than for females, with 50 percent of enrolled boys regularly attending school compared to 41 percent for enrolled girls. Regarding Pakistan, UNESCO (2012a) reports that more than two-thirds of all children never attending school are female. As adults, many more women than men are illiterate; two-thirds of the 49.5 million Pakistani adults that cannot read are female. The remainder of this report is organized as follows. The next section is a brief review of the literature on the obstacles to female education in developing countries that are believed to contribute to the gender gap. We also review the literature on some of the economic and social consequences of an educational gender gap. The subsequent section describes the survey instrument and sample design. In the third section, we summarize the main empirical findings of this study, and the final section provides conclusions.

Pages: 40 pages
Date: 2017-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://icepp.gsu.edu/files/2017/05/paper1707.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ays:ispwps:paper1707

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU from International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Paul Benson ().