Quantifying the High-Frequency Trading “Arms Raceâ€: A Simple New Methodology and Estimates
Matteo Aquilina (matteo.aquilina@fsb.org) and
Eric Budish (eric.budish@chicagobooth.edu)
Additional contact information
Matteo Aquilina: Financial Conduct Authority
Eric Budish: University of Chicago - Booth School of Business; NBER
No 2020-86, Working Papers from Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics
Abstract:
We use stock exchange message data to quantify the negative aspect of high-frequency trading, known as “latency arbitrage.†The key difference between message data and widely-familiar limit order book data is that message data contain attempts to trade or cancel that fail. This allows the researcher to observe both winners and losers in a race, whereas in limit order book data you cannot see the losers, so you cannot directly see the races. We find that latency-arbitrage races are very frequent (about one per minute per symbol for FTSE 100 stocks), extremely fast (the modal race lasts 5-10 millionths of a second), and account for a large portion of overall trading volume (about 20%). Race participation is concentrated, with the top 6 firms accounting for over 80% of all race wins and losses. Most races (about 90%) are won by an aggressive order as opposed to a cancel attempt; market participants outside the top 6 firms disproportionately provide the liquidity that gets taken in races (about 60%). Our main estimates suggest that eliminating latency arbitrage would reduce the market’s cost of liquidity by 17% and that the total sums at stake are on the order of $5 billion annually in global equity markets.
Pages: 93 pages
Date: 2020
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cwa and nep-mst
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)
Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.bfi.uchicago.edu/RePEc/pdfs/BFI_WP_202086.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bfi:wpaper:2020-86
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Toni Shears (bfi@uchicago.edu this e-mail address is bad, please contact repec@repec.org).