Why Was Keynes Opposed to Reparations and Carthaginian Peace?‎

Elise Brezis ()

No 2022-04, Working Papers from Bar-Ilan University, Department of Economics

Abstract: The Economic Consequences of the Peace was first published in 1919, and since then, changed the economic discourse surrounding reparations and Carthaginian peace. This paper specifies how three elements hinted at in the introduction of the Economic Consequences of the Peace – social classes, national sovereignty, and the international political system – can explain Keynes’ assessment of Carthaginian peace. The paper analyzes the optimality of reparations in the context of these three elements. I show that in the situation of a hegemonic country, all classes - the working class as well as the elite - opt for no reparations. But, in a balance of power context, wherein no single actor on the international scene possesses hegemonic status, the working class will choose harsh reparations, while the transnational elite and Keynes will not.

Keywords: Balance of Power; Carthaginian Peace; Hegemony; Reparations; National Sovereignty. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B17 B27 E12 F30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 23 pages
Date: 2022-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cwa, nep-his, nep-hpe, nep-mac and nep-pke
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://econ.biu.ac.il/sites/econ/files/working-papers/2022-04_0.pdf Working paper (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:biu:wpaper:2022-04

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Bar-Ilan University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Department of Economics ().