At‐risk acquirers: survival strategy or last‐ditch effort?

Joshua Coyne, Kevin H. Kim and Jayson Talakai

Accounting and Finance, 2021, vol. 61, issue 4, 5783-5808

Abstract: Managers of at‐risk firms have incentives to prolong the life of the company or to extract personal wealth prior to firm liquidation, and they can pursue a number of activities in order to achieve these goals. Prior studies have investigated the consequences of managers becoming targets for acquisition. In this study, we examine the consequences of at‐risk firms doing the opposite: buying other firms (i.e., becoming at‐risk acquirers). We find two positive consequences of becoming at‐risk acquirers. At‐risk acquirers (1) avoid delisting due to poor performance and (2) leave at‐risk status in the year following the acquisition. We also find that these benefits are only temporary and come at a cost. Specifically, at‐risk acquirers are less likely to become subsequent targets, and they quickly return to at‐risk status. These results indicate that the decision of the manager of an at‐risk firm to become an at‐risk acquirer buys the manager more time but does not help the firm.

Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12776

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:61:y:2021:i:4:p:5783-5808

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0810-5391

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting and Finance is currently edited by Robert Faff

More articles in Accounting and Finance from Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery (contentdelivery@wiley.com).