Measuring the risk attitude of decision-makers: are there differences between groups of methods and persons?
Syster C. Maart-Noelck and
Oliver Musshoff
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2014, vol. 58, issue 3, 336-352
Abstract:
type="main" xml:id="ajar620-abs-0001">
Many studies quantifying individual risk preferences of test persons show that results of different measuring methods may vary. Additional reservations about the reliability of the results regarding the risk attitude measurement arise from the fact that most studies are based on convenience groups, such as students or businessmen in developing countries. With this in mind, we systematically compare different measuring methods to answer the question how the choice of method affects the results. Moreover, we compare the risk preferences of German farmers with those of students and Kazakhstani farmers to investigate whether farmers’ risk preferences can be approximated through those of convenience groups. The methods applied comprise an incentive-compatible Holt-and-Laury-lottery as well as two psychometric methods. Results show that students respond consistently across all three elicitation methods whereas German and Kazakhstani farmers are more inconsistent. Significant differences exist in the responses of German students and German farmers. The comparison of risk preferences between German and Kazakhstani farmers, however, reveals significant similarities with respect to the psychometric methods.
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (32)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ajar.2014.58.issue-3 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Journal Article: Measuring the risk attitude of decision-makers: are there differences between groups of methods and persons? (2014) ![Downloads](/downloads_econpapers.gif)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:58:y:2014:i:3:p:336-352
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ordering.onli ... 1111/(ISSN)1467-8489
Access Statistics for this article
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics is currently edited by John Rolfe, Lin Crase and John Tisdell
More articles in Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics from Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery (contentdelivery@wiley.com).