Gender mainstreaming in Korean aid? Rethinking narratives about women's economic empowerment
Jae‐Eun Noh
Development Policy Review, 2026, vol. 44, issue 3
Abstract:
Motivation The rise of gender equality as a priority in international development, despite concerning signs such as backlash and waning commitment, has shaped Korean aid's adoption of gender‐equality policies and guidelines under the banner of gender mainstreaming. Despite its increased commitment to gender mainstreaming, Korea's gender‐related funding remains low, and its recent emphasis on women's economic empowerment raises questions about how this concept is understood and implemented, particularly given Korea's persistent economic gender gap. Purpose This study examines how women's economic empowerment is conceptualized and implemented within Korean aid projects, paying particular attention to the underlying assumptions that inform these approaches. Approach and Methods I searched the Korean International Cooperation Agency (KOICA) website for publicly available evaluation reports and identified 12 aid projects related to women's economic empowerment. Findings The analysis reveals four assumptions: gendered skills and roles, the link between nominal participation and gender equality, the instrumentality of women's economic empowerment, and the notion of market‐led growth. These assumptions reflect broader Korean discourses on gender and development and present barriers to a transformative approach to gender equality. Policy Implications This study demonstrates how domestic norms and sociopolitical dynamics shape aid policies and practices. It also highlights the need to interrogate embedded assumptions, rather than simply adopting and institutionalizing gender‐mainstreaming measures, and to engage with divergent understandings and practices of gender equality across international, national, or local contexts.
Date: 2026
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.70073
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:devpol:v:44:y:2026:i:3:n:e70073
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0950-6764
Access Statistics for this article
Development Policy Review is currently edited by David Booth
More articles in Development Policy Review from Overseas Development Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().