Age heaping and its discontents: A response to Baten, Benati, and Ferber
Brian A'Hearn,
Alexia Delfino (alexia.delfino@unibocconi.it) and
Alessandro Nuvolari
Economic History Review, 2022, vol. 75, issue 3, 972-980
Abstract:
This note is a rejoinder to Baten, Benati, and Ferber. We reiterate that, on close inspection, nineteenth‐century Italian census data contain a number of anomalies that sit uncomfortably with a straightforward age‐heaping‐as‐numeracy interpretation. In particular, we respond to Baten, Benati, and Ferber on the technical matters they have raised; then we show that our findings are robust to such criticism. Finally, we conclude with some general reflections on age heaping as a numeracy indicator.
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.13140
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:75:y:2022:i:3:p:972-980
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0013-0117
Access Statistics for this article
Economic History Review is currently edited by Stephen Broadberry
More articles in Economic History Review from Economic History Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery (contentdelivery@wiley.com).