Numerical Maximisation of Likelihood: A Neglected Alternative to EM?
Iain L. MacDonald
International Statistical Review, 2014, vol. 82, issue 2, 296-308
Abstract:
type="main" xml:id="insr12041-abs-0001"> There is by now a long tradition of using the EM algorithm to find maximum-likelihood estimates (MLEs) when the data are incomplete in any of a wide range of ways, even when the observed-data likelihood can easily be evaluated and numerical maximisation of that likelihood is available as a conceptually simple route to the MLEs. It is rare in the literature to see numerical maximisation employed if EM is possible. But with excellent general-purpose numerical optimisers now available free, there is no longer any reason, as a matter of course, to avoid direct numerical maximisation of likelihood. In this tutorial, I present seven examples of models in which numerical maximisation of likelihood appears to have some advantages over the use of EM as a route to MLEs. The mathematical and coding effort is minimal, as there is no need to derive and code the E and M steps, only a likelihood evaluator. In all the examples, the unconstrained optimiser nlm available in R is used, and transformations are used to impose constraints on parameters. I suggest therefore that the following question be asked of proposed new applications of EM: Can the MLEs be found more simply and directly by using a general-purpose numerical optimiser?
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/insr.12041 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:istatr:v:82:y:2014:i:2:p:296-308
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0306-7734
Access Statistics for this article
International Statistical Review is currently edited by Eugene Seneta and Kees Zeelenberg
More articles in International Statistical Review from International Statistical Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().