Measurement error in research on financial literacy: How much error is there and how does it influence effect size estimates?

Gilles E. Gignac and Elizabeth Ooi

Journal of Consumer Affairs, 2022, vol. 56, issue 2, 938-956

Abstract: Financial literacy is often measured with only three to five questions, suggesting challenges with achieving respectable levels of internal consistency reliability. Based on our review, we found financial literacy tests composed of three and five test questions yielded mean reliability estimates of 0.40 (k = 7; N = 167,075) and 0.54 (k = 8; N = 57,937), respectively: values less than minimally acceptable for even exploratory research. Based on our more comprehensive review of 52 samples and a variety of financial literacy tests (3–45 questions), researchers are recommended to measure financial literacy with a minimum of 13–15 questions. Finally, we conclude that the potential impact of financial literacy on various outcome variables has been underestimated substantially in many previous investigations, as the relatively low levels of internal consistency reliability in the financial literacy test scores attenuated the obtained effects estimated from the observed scores.

Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12417

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:56:y:2022:i:2:p:938-956

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0022-0078

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Consumer Affairs is currently edited by Sharon Tennyson

More articles in Journal of Consumer Affairs from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().