Predictability in Financial Analyst Forecast Errors: Learning or Irrationality?

Stanimir Markov and Ane Tamayo

Journal of Accounting Research, 2006, vol. 44, issue 4, 725-761

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a rational learning‐based explanation for the predictability in financial analysts' earnings forecast errors documented in prior literature. In particular, we argue that the serial correlation pattern in analysts' quarterly earnings forecast errors is consistent with an environment in which analysts face parameter uncertainty and learn rationally about the parameters over time. Using simulations and real data, we show that the predictability evidence is more consistent with rational learning than with irrationality (fixation on a seasonal random walk model or some other dogmatic belief).

Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00215.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:joares:v:44:y:2006:i:4:p:725-761

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1475679x

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Accounting Research is currently edited by Philip G. Berger, Anna Costello, Luzi Hail, Valeri Nikolaev, Haresh Sapra, Laurence van Lent and Regina Wittenberg Moerman

More articles in Journal of Accounting Research from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().