Modelling non‐response in the National Child Development Study
Denise Hawkes and
Ian Plewis
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 2006, vol. 169, issue 3, 479-491
Abstract:
Summary. There is widespread concern that the cumulative effects of the non‐response that is bound to affect any long‐running longitudinal study will lead to mistaken inferences about change. We focus on the National Child Development Study and show how non‐response has accumulated over time. We distinguish between attrition and wave non‐response and show how these two kinds of non‐response can be related to a set of explanatory variables. We model the discrete time hazard of non‐response and also fit a set of multinomial logistic regressions to the probabilities of different kinds of non‐response at a particular sweep. We find that the best predictors of non‐response at any sweep are generally variables that are measured at the previous sweep but, although non‐response is systematic, much of the variation in it remains unexplained by our models. We consider the implications of our results for both design and analysis.
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (37)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00401.x
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:169:y:2006:i:3:p:479-491
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ordering.onli ... 1111/(ISSN)1467-985X
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A is currently edited by A. Chevalier and L. Sharples
More articles in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A from Royal Statistical Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().